According to the fact sheet released by the White House, at the 29 October 2025 summit meeting the presidents of the United States and the Republic of Korea reached an agreement that will support the development of nuclear fuel cycle technologies as well as that of naval nuclear reactors in South Korea.

The fact sheet states:

  • Consistent with the bilateral 123 agreement and subject to U.S. legal requirements, the United States supports the process that will lead to the ROK's civil uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing for peaceful uses.

  • The United States has given approval for the ROK to build nuclear-powered attack submarines. The United States will work closely with the ROK to advance requirements for this shipbuilding project, including avenues to source fuel.

The 123 agreement between the United States and the Republic of Korea, concluded in 2015 and expected to remain in force until 2040, does not prohibit the development of enrichment or reprocessing. However, it imposes restrictions on the use of materials or technologies supplied by the United States under this cooperation agreement.

The clause that deals with nuclear-powered submarines does not seem to commit the United States to a transfer of technology or material. Importantly, the current agreement explicitly prohibits enriching US-origin uranium to more than 20% uranium-235.

The President of Russia signed a federal law that formally ended Russia's participation in the US-Russian Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement (PMDA). The law denounces the agreement, signed on 29 August 2000 in Moscow and on 1 September 2000 in Washington, and the protocols to the agreement, signed on 15 September 2006 and on 13 April 2010.

The agreement, as amended by a protocol in 2010, committed the United States and Russia each to eliminate 34 tonnes of plutonium "designated as no longer required for defense purposes."

Russia suspended the implementation of the agreement in October 2016, citing "unfriendly actions of the United States." To a large extent the suspension was a result of a dispute about the United States unilaterally changing its plutonium disposition method (see also earlier IPFM analysis as well as this article).

It is worth noting that while Russia ratified PMDA in 2011, the agreement has never been in force. The Federal Law No. 108-FZ on the ratification of PMDA was signed by the then-President Medvedev on 3 June 2011. The law would have entered into force ten days after its official publication on the pravo.gov.ru portal. However, it has never been officially published and therefore the agreement has never entered into force. For this reason, the current law denounces the agreement and its protocols directly rather than denouncing the 2011 law that ratified it.

In 2016, Russia's participation in the PMDA was suspended by a presidential decree (which also did not mention the fact of ratification in 2011). In it, President Putin decreed:

To establish that plutonium covered by the [PMDA] Agreement [...] shall not be used for the purposes of manufacturing nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, for research, development, design, or testing related to such devices, or for any other military purposes.

The legal status of this obligation is not clear but it appears to remain in force unless a subsequent presidential decree revokes it. The Federal Law No. 381-FZ from 31 October 2016, which was passed to codify the suspension, does not contain this clause. The law on the denunciation of PMDA does not revoke or even mention the 2016 decree, so it appears that the obligation not to use the PMDA material for military purposes continues to apply.

On 21 October 2025, the US Department of Energy issued a Request for Applications DE-FOA-0003594 as part of "a program for making surplus plutonium materials available to industry for advanced nuclear technologies."

The program was established by the May 2025 executive order that also terminated the previously selected disposition route, the dilute and dispose program. That program was authorized in 2016 and sent the first material to WIPP in 2022. It should be noted that the DoE does not exclude the possibility of returning some of the material allocated to the current program to the dilute and dispose route.

The total amount of plutonium that is offered to industry is 19.7 metric tons (MT). Of this, 15.3 MT is in oxide form and 4.4 MT is in the metal form. About 7.1 MT of this is weapon-grade plutonium (about 1 MT is in metal form). The full breakdown by categories is in the table below. An earlier report by Politico suggested that the DoE is prepared to make available up to 25 MT of plutonium.

20251021_SurplusPu.png

According to ANS, there are at least four companies that expressed interest in using plutonium: Curio, Lightbridge, Newcleo, and Oklo.

The uranium enrichment plant in Rokkasho, operated by Japan Nuclear Fuel Ltd, has received a shipment of natural uranium from Cameco, a Canadian company. The shipment included "up to 625 tons of uranium contained in 50 cylinders" (50 48Y cylinders).

This is the first shipment of uranium to Rokkasho since July 2014. As shown in the chart, reproduced from the JNFL site, the plant has shipped virtually no enriched uranium after 2012.

20251014 Rokkasho enrichment.png

It is not clear if the plant has been producing enriched uranium during this period. According to an industry report, the plant suspended operations in 2017, but resumed them in August 2023.

It was estimated that in 2019, the plant had the capacity of 75 tSWU/year. The current capacity of the plant is reported to be 112.5 tSWU/year. The same report says that JNFL aims to expand capacity to 450 tons SWU/year by FY2028. This plan appears to include the upgrade of the No. 2 cascade facility with the capacity of 150 tSWU/year.

The JNFL plans to eventually bring the capacity of the plant to 1,500 tSWU/year.

US National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) awarded a contract, currently valued at $1.5 billion, to BWXT Enrichment Operations, LLC "for the licensing, manufacturing development, facility construction, and operations of a Domestic Uranium Enrichment Centrifuge Experiment (DUECE) pilot plant."

The plant is part of the effort to establish the supply of unobligated enriched uranium that can be used for defense purposes: LEU for tritium production and HEU for naval nuclear propulsion.

In 2024, NNSA asked Nuclear Fuel Services, a subsidiary of BWXT, to conduct a study of domestic enrichment options.

According to Orano, the 9th shipment of MOX fuel from France to Japan has left France on 6 September 2025 and is expected to arrive in Japan in November 2025. The ships that transfer the fuel are "Pacific Heron and Pacific Egret, the specialized ships belonging to British company PNTL."

The 8th shipment was completed in September 2022.

UPDATE: The ships arrived in Japan on 17 November 2025.

US Department of Energy added three companies to the list of enterprises that received a conditional commitment to receive HALEU from DoE sources. These are listed as

  • Antares Nuclear, Inc., for use in their advanced microreactor design that is looking to go critical by July 4, 2026, under the Department's Reactor Pilot Program.
  • Standard Nuclear, Inc., to establish TRISO fuel lines to support the Reactor Pilot Program and other TRISO-fueled reactors.
  • Abilene Christian University/Natura Resources LLC, for use in a new molten salt research reactor that is under construction in Texas.

These companies join the five recipients identified in April 2025:

  • TRISO-X, LLC.
  • Kairos Power, LLC.
  • Radiant Industries, Inc.
  • Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC
  • TerraPower, LLC.

These commitments are part of the HALEU Allocation Process, which seeks to provide US companies with uranium enriched to up to 20% uranium-235. The document, dated 28 August 2025, refers to the previous commitments made by the US government.

The National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2024 (Section 3131(h)) directed DoE to "seek to make available" HALEU in the following quantities: 3 MT by September 30, 2024, an additional 8 MT by December 31, 2025, and an additional 10 MT by June 30, 2026.

The "Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies" Executive Order, issued in May 2025 further directed DoE "to release at least 20 metric tons of high-assay low-enriched uranium into a readily available fuel bank." This material, however, would have to be allocated "for private sector projects operating nuclear reactors ... at DOE sites."

The 2024 annual report of Russia's Federal Nuclear and Radiological Security Program contains data on spent fuel reprocessing at the RT-1 plant at Mayak.

The "irradiated standard uranium blocks" are fuel elements that were used in plutonium production reactors. BOR, SM, and MIR are research reactors.

The nominal capacity of the RT-1 plant is 400 tonnes of fuel a year. Historically, it has been reprocessing about 110-130 tonnes of fuel a year.

The document also shows that the cumulative total amount of reprocessed fuel in 2016-2024 was 993 tonnes.

In its 2024-2025 Annual Report, the UK's National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority gave the program "to site and construct a permanent geological disposal facility" for "higher activity radioactive waste" a RED rating (row 32 in this sheet). This rating means that as currently structured, the project is deemed unachievable. The report also estimates that the project could cost up to £54b.